بررسی رابطه طول- وزن، فراوانی طولی، درصد بلوغ و پارامترهای رشد میگوهای ببری سبز (Penaeus semisulcatus de Haan, 1844) صید شده توسط تور ترال در آب‌های استان بوشهر (مند و دیر-نخیلو)

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه شیلات دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

2 نویسنده مسئول، گروه شیلات دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران و هسته پژوهشی مدیریت شیلات و توسعه پایدار اکوسیستم دریایی، معاونت پژوهش و فناوری دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

3 گروه شیلات دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران و هسته پژوهشی مدیریت شیلات و توسعه پایدار اکوسیستم دریایی، معاونت پژوهش و فناوری دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

4 مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم شیلاتی کشور، سازمان تحقیقات و آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف این مطالعه بررسی رابطه طول- وزن، فراوانی طولی، درصد بلوغ و تعیین پارامترهای رشد میگوهای ببری سبز صید شده با ابزار ترال در طی سال های 1399 (13 مرداد تا 15 بهمن) و 1400 (11 فروردین تا 9 شهریور) در مناطق مند و دیر-نخیلو واقع در استان بوشهر بود. تعداد 658 میگوی ببری که شامل 420 عدد میگو ماده و 238 عدد میگوی نر مورد زیست‌ سنجی قرار گرفت. بر اساس طول کاراپاس 43/43 میلیمتر در اولین بلوغ جنسی، 71/50 درصد (213 عدد) بالغ و 29/49 درصد (217 عدد) نابالغ بودند. همچنین رابطه بین طول کل و کاراپاس میگوهای ماده بر اساس رگرسیون خطی 1648/2- x 3679/0=y بدست آمد. میزان پارامترهای a، b و r2 رابطه طول و وزن برای ماده ها به ترتیب 0099/0، 057/3 و 92/0 و برای نرها به ترتیب 0115/0، 9962/2 و 912/0 بود. پارامترهای رشد (Clinf, K, t0) برای جنس ماده به ترتیب 057/0- ، 1/2 و 72 (میلی متر) وبرای جنس نر به ترتیب 075/0- ، 7/1 و 62 (میلی متر) بود. میزان پارامترهای Z،F و M نیز برای جنس ماده به ترتیب 2/9، 4/7 و 16/2 و برای جنس نر به ترتیب 58/7، 62/5 و 96/1 بدست آمد. نرخ بهره برداری (E) برای ماده ها 77/0 و برای نرها 74/0 بود. این مقادیر نشان دهنده بهره برداری بیش از حد، فشار صیادی در منطقه است. لذا اجرای رویکردهای مدیریتی صید در این زیستگاه ها ضروری می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Length-weight relationship, length abundance, maturity percentage and growth parameters of green tiger prawn (Penaeus semisulcatus de Haan, 1844) caught by trawl net in the waters of Bushehr province (in Mond and Dayyer-Nakhilo)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khosrow Darvishi 1
  • Ehsan Kamrani 2
  • Mohsen Safaei 1
  • Moslem Daliri 3
  • Fereidoon Owfi 4
1 Dept. of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
2 Corresponding Author, Dept. of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
3 Dept. of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran
4 Fisheries Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Training Organization, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Length-weight relationship, length abundance, maturity percentage and growth parameters of green tiger prawn caught using trawl nets in Mond and Dayyer-Nakhilo areas located in Bushehr province during the years 2020 (13 August to 15 February) and 2021 (11 April to 9 September). A total of 658 tiger shrimps, including 420 female shrimp and 238 male shrimp were bioassayed. Based on the carapace length of 43.43 mm in the first sexual maturity of the females, 50.71% (213 specimens) were mature and 49.29% (217 specimens) were immature. Also, the relationship between the total length and carapace length of female shrimps was y=0.3679 x - 2.1648 based on linear regression. The relationship between the length and weight of 420 female shrimps and 238 male shrimps caught showed that parameters a, b, and r2 were 0.0099, 3.057, and 0.92 for females and 0.0115, 2.9962, and 0.912 for males, respectively. Based on the Sturges formula, 10 length classes were observed for male and female shrimps caught. The length class of 108-12.3 cm for both males and females had the highest frequency with 110 specimens (46.22%) and 141 specimens (33.57%), respectively. The results of this study showed that the maximum length of male (16 cm) and female (20.5 cm) caught shrimps was less than the infinite length and more than the optimal length. Growth parameters (Clinf, K, t0) for females were -0.057, 2.1 and 72 (mm) and for males -0.075, 1.7 and 62 (mm), respectively. The values of Z, F and M parameters for females were 9.2, 7.4 and 2.16 and for males 7.58, 5.62 and 1.96. The exploitation rate (E) was 0.77 for females and 0.74 for males. These values indicate overexploitation and fishing pressure in the area. Therefore, it is necessary to implement fishing management approaches in these habitats.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Length-Weight relationship
  • Growth parameters
  • Maturity percentage
  • Penaeus semisulcatus
  • Bushehr province

مراجع

1.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Toward Blue Transformation, Rome. 266p.
2.Friedman, K. J., Bartley, D. M., Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N., Mair, G. C., Ban, N., Beveridge, M., & Vigar, J. R. J. (2022). Current and future genetic technologies for fisheries and aquaculture: implications for the work of FAO. FAO fisheries and aquaculture circular.
3.Wulandari, T., Kartika, W. D., & Riany, H. (2019). The commercial coastal shrimp of the Penaeidae family from Tanjung Jabung Timur, Indonesia. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation. 12 (6), 2221-222.
4.Tamadoni Jahromi, S., Sofman Othman, A., Rosazlina, R., Pourmozaffar, S., & Gozari, M. (2021). Population genetics of Penaeus semisulcatus from Persian Gulf and Oman Sea using newly developed DNA microsatellite markers. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. 20 (1), 157-178.
5.Aein Jamshid, K., Rabbaniha, M., Fazelpour, K., Moradi, G., & Nasouri, M. (2022). Relationship between shrimp catches per unit effort (CPUE) and satellite-based environmental parameters in Persian Gulf, Bushehr provincial waters. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. 21 (2), 372-386.
6.Niamaimandi, N., Arshad, A. B., Daud, S. K., Saed, R. C., & Kiabi, B. (2008). Growth parameters and maximum age of prown, Penaeus semisulcatus (De Haan) in Bushehr waters, Persian Gulf. Iranian journal of Fisheries Sciences. 7 (2), 187-204.
7.Gumanao, G. S., Saceda‐Cardoza, M. M., Mueller, B., & Bos, A. R. (2016). Length–weight and length–length relationships of 139 Indo‐Pacific fish species (Teleostei) from the Davao Gulf, Philippines. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 32 (2), 377-385.
8.Saberi, M., Paighambari, S. Y., Darvishi, M., & Farkhondeh Shilsar, G. (2017). Length–weight relationships of six fish species from the Coastal Waters of Jask, Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology.33 (6), 1226-1228.
9.Lelli, S., Lteif, M., Jemaa, S., Khalaf, G., & Verdoit-Jarraya, M. (2018). Weight-length relationships of 3 demersal fish species from Lebanese marine waters, eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 34 (1), 153-156.
10.Paighambari, S. Y., Pouladi, M., Daliri, M., & Moghimi Tilami, B. (2018). Length–weight relationships of four marine fish species in Motaf fishing grounds, southern waters of Bushehr (the north of the Persian Gulf, Iran). Journal of Applied Ichthyology.34 (4), 1017-1018.
11.Pouladi, M., Moradinasab, A., Paighambari, S. Y., Daliri, M., Raeisi, H., & Shabani, M. J. (2018). Length–weight relationships of three caught flatfish using shrimp trawler in Motaf fishing grounds, Bushehr province (Persian Gulf). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34 (3), 750-752.
12.Radkhah, A., & Eagderi, S. (2015). Length-weight and length-length relationships and condition factor of six cyprinid fish species of Zarrineh River (Urmia Lake basin, Iran). Iranian Journal of Ichthyology. 2 (1), 61-64.
13.Keivany, Y., Dopeikar, H., Ghorbani, M., Kiani, F., & Paykan Heyrati, F. (2016). Length–weight and length–length relationships of three cyprinid fishes from the Bibi-Sayyedan River, western Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 32 (3), 507-508.
14.Torres, M. A., Ramos, F., & Sobrino, I. (2012). Length–weight relationships of 76 fish species from the Gulf of
Cadiz (SW Spain). Fisheries Research, 127, 171-175.
15.Ferreira, S., Sousa, R., Delgado, J., Carvalho, D., & Chada, T. (2008). Weight–length relationships for demersal fish species caught off the Madeira archipelago (eastern‐central Atlantic). Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 24 (1), 93-95.
16.Parsa, M., Rahnama, B., & Mahmoudi Khoshdarehgi, M. (2017). Length–weight relationships of five fish species from Carangidae family in waters of the northern Persian Gulf, Iran. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 33 (5), 1055-1057.
17.Pouladi, M., Paighambari, S. Y., Millar, R. B., & Babanezhad, M. (2020). Length-weight relationships and condition factor of five marine fish species from Bushehr Province, Persian Gulf, Iran. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences. 36 (2), 457-461.
18.Siddik, M. A. B., Chaklader, M. R., Hanif, M. A., Islam, M. A., & Fotedar, R. (2016). Length–weight relationships of four fish species from a coastal artisanal fishery, southern Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 32 (6), 1300-1302.
19.Barreto, T. M., Freire, K. M., Júnior, J. J. R., Rosa, L. C., Carvalho-Filho, A., & Rotundo, M. M. (2018). Fish species caught by shrimp trawlers off the coast of Sergipe, in north-eastern Brazil, and their length–weight relations. Acta Ichthyologica Et Piscatoria. 48 (3), 277-283.
20.Wetherall, J. A. (1986). A new method for estimating growth and mortality parameters from length frequency data. Fishbyte. 4 (1), 12-14.
21.Von Bertalanffy, L. (1938). A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws. II). Human Biology. 10 (2), 181-213.
22.Beverton, R. J. H. (1992). Patterns of reproductive strategy parameters in some marine teleost fishes. Journal of Fish Biology. 41, 137-160.
23.Alizadeh, E., Safaie, M., Momeni, M., & Kamrani, E. (2022). Population dynamics of two morphotypes of green tiger shrimp Penaeus semisulcatus de Haan, 1844 in the northern coast of Iran. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 69 (2), 7-18.
24.Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (2011). The length weight relationship of fishes: a review. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 22 (4), 241-253.
25.Biswas, S. P. (1993). Manual of methods in fish biology, South Asian Publishers. 157 p.
26.Froese, R., Tsikliras, A. C., & Stergiou, K. I. (2011). Editorial note on weight–length relations of fishes. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria. 41 (4), 261-263.
27.Froese, R. (2006). Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: history, meta.analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 22 (4), 241-253.
28.Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis (5th edition), Pearson highered. 945 p.
29.Sparre, P., & Venema, C. (1992). Introduction to tropical Fish Stock Assessment, FAO of the united nation, Part 1: manual. 407 p.
30.Evagelopoulos, A., Batjakas, I. E., Spinos, E., & Bakopoulos, V. (2020). Length–weight relationships of 12 commercial fish species caught with static fishing gear in the N. Ionian Sea (Greece). Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences. 36 (1), 37-40.
31.Jennings, S., Kaiser, M. J., & Reynold, J. D. (2001). Marine fisheries ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
32.Dall, W. H. B. J., Hill, J., Rothlisberg, P. C., Sharples, D. J., Blaxter, J. H., & Southward, A. J. (1990). Advances in Marine Biology. Academic press.
33.Chu, K. H., Chen, Q. C., Huang, L. M., & Wong, C. K. (1995). Morphometric analysis of commercially important penaeid shrimps from the Zhujiang estuary, China. Fisheries Research. 23 (1-2), 83-93.
34.Pillai, S. L., Radhakrishnan, E. V., Maheswarudu, G., & Radhakrishnan, M. (2017). Length-weight relationship and certain biological aspects of the Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) exploited by trawls in the Arabian Sea off Kerala coast, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 64 (4), 112-115.
35.Peixoto, S., Cavalli, R. O., D'incao, F., Milach, Â. M., & Wasielesky, W. (2003). Ovarian maturation of wild Farfantepenaeus paulensis in relation to histological and visual changes. Aquaculture Research. 34 (14), 1255-1260.
36.Kaka, R. M., Jung'a, J. O., Badamana, M., Ruwa, R. K., & Karisa, H. C. (2019). Morphometric length-weight relationships of wild penaeid shrimps in Malindi-Ungwana Bay: Implications to aquaculture development in Kenya. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 45 (2), 167-173.
37.Teodoro, S. S. A., Terossi, M., Mantelatto, F. L., & Costa, R. C. (2016). Discordance in the identification of juvenile pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis and F. paulensis: Family Penaeidae): an integrative approach using morphology, morphometry and barcoding. Fisheries Research. 183, 244-253.
38.Cheng, C. S., & Chen, L. C. (1990). Growth characteristics and relationships among body length, body weight and tail weight of Penaeus monodon from a culture environment in Taiwan. Aquaculture. 91 (3-4), 253-263.
39.Primavera, J. H., Parado-Estepa, F. D., & Lebata, J. L. (1998). Morphometric relationship of length and weight of giant tiger prawn Penaeus monodon according to life stage, sex and source. Aquaculture. 164 (1-4), 67-75.
40.de Carvalho, C., Oshiro, L. M., & Keunecke, K. A. (2021). Growth and mortality analyses of the white shrimp Penaeus schmitti (Decapoda: Penaeidae) in Sepetiba Bay, Brazil: An exploited data-deficient species. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 42, 101641.
مجله بهره برداری و پرورش آبزیان
دوره 12، شماره 4
دی 1402
صفحه 173-184

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار