بررسی رفتار مصرف‌کنندگان و سرانه مصرف آبزیان در روستاهای استان گلستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار گروه فرآوری محصولات شیلاتی، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری گروه فرآوری محصولات شیلاتی، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران.

3 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد گروه فرآوری محصولات شیلاتی، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

رفتار خانوارهای روستایی استان گلستان برای مصرف ماهی ارزیابی گردید. اطلاعات از طریق جمع آوری پرسشنامه طراحی شده، انجام شد. در تحلیل استنباطی پژوهش، از آزمون‌های کای دو، من‌ویتنی‌یو و امتیازدهی برای رتبه‌بندی استفاده شد. 3/51 درصد خانوارها علاقه‌مند به ماهی سرخ شده و 7/32 درصد ماهی شکم پر بوده و به ترتیب 3/37% و 3/33% خانوارها در این مناطق ماهی را از محل بهره‌برداری و بازارماهی‌فروشان تامین می‌کنند. حدود 57% از آنان کم‌تر از دوبار در ماه ومیانگین 12/6 کیلوگرم ماهی می‌خرند. 42% از آن‌ها کنسرو ماهی مصرف کرده و سرانه‌ی مصرف ماهی آنان7/37 کیلوگرم بود. مهم‌ترین دلایل مصرف ماهی آنان به ترتیب کیفیت و تازگی، ارزانی، پاک و بهداشتی بودن و خواص و ارزش غذایی بود. .. افراد زیر 45 سال، عرضه‌ی ماهی به‌صورت بسته‌بندی‌شده و منجمد را می‌پسندند در صورتی که افراد با درآمد بیشتر و بالای 25 میلیون ریال به خرید ماهی تازه، فیله و کاملا پاک شده و گروه مقابل که درآمد کمتر دارند به کنسرو گرایش بیشتری دارند. .. خاصیت و ارزش غذایی ماهی دریایی را نسبت به ماهی پرورشی خیلی زیادتر می‌دانند و در تشخیص ماهی تازه از ماهی مانده، مهارت زیادی داشتند. بنابراین امکان فراهم‌سازی بازار و عرضه‌ی محصولات فرآوری شده جهت کمک به اقتصاد خانوارهای روستایی در استان جهت افزایش سرانه‌ی مصرف وجود دارد. با این وصف، امکان دسترسی به ماهیان دریایی و کاهش قیمت آبزیان در روستاها برای افزایش مصرف می بایستی فراهم شود و بررسی ویژه مصرف ماهیان دریایی و پرورشی در مناطق روستایی توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Status of consumer behavior and per capita fish consumption in villages of Golestan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Afshin Adeli 1
  • Tahereh Taghani 2
  • Eisa Pangh 3
  • Samiollah Abedi 3
1 Corresponding Author, Associate Prof., Dept. of Processing of Fishery Products, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Processing of Fishery Products, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3 M.Sc. Graduate, Dept. of Processing of Fishery Products, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The behavior of rural households for fish consumption was evaluated in the Golestan province of Iran . Data were collected through a designed questionnaire. In the inferential analysis of the research, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and scoring tests were used for ranking. 51.3% of households are interested in fried fish and 32.7% are stuffed fish and 37.3% and 33.3% of households in these areas supply fish from the place of fishing and harvesting and fish market. About 57% buy less than twice a month and an average of 6.12 kg of fish. 42% of them consumed canned food and their per capita consumption was 37.7 kg. The most important reasons for consuming their fish were one to four quality and freshness, cheapness, cleanliness and hygiene, and nutritional properties and value, respectively... People under 45 years old like the supply of packaged and frozen fish. People with higher income and above 25 million Rials buy fresh, filleted and completely cleaned fish and the opposite group with lower income are more inclined to canned fish. .. They consider the properties and nutritional value of marine fish to be much higher than farmed fish, and they had great skill in distinguishing fresh fish from stale fish. Therefore, there is a possibility of providing a market and supply of processed products to help the economy of rural households in the province to increase fish per capita consumption. However, the possibility of access to marine fish and reducing the price of fish in rural should be provided to increase consumption, and a special study of the consumption of marine and farmed fish in rural areas is recommended.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Per capita fish consumption
  • reasons for purchase
  • village
  • consumer behavior
  • Golestan province

مراجع

1.Globefish, (2017). Review of global tuna trade and major markets. Cited http:// www.fao.org/in-action/globefish/ market- reports/tuna/en/.
2.Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite. 84(-), 212-227.
3.Mygolinejad, E. (2012). Fisheries and Aquatics; Challenges and potential, Economic Research Department of Center for Strategic Research, Strategic Report 151. Code: 0489113 25P.
4.Kotler, Ph., & Armstrong, G. M. (2005). Principles of marketing. Pearson prentice hall. 11th ed., 711p.
5.Adeli, A., Hasangholipour, T., Hossaini, A., Salehi, H., & Shabanpour, B. (2011). Status of fish Consumption per capita
of Tehran citizens. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. 10, 546-556.
6.Aid, A. (2002). Farm gate: the developmental impact of agricultural subsidies. London, Gt Britain.
7.Aghili, S. M., Safari, R., Shabanpour, B., & Rahmani, M. (2010). An analysis of the consumer market for aquatics and fishery products in Gorgan. Journal of Fisheries Islamic Azad University. 4 (3), 91-101.
8.IFO. (2021). Iran fisheries statistic annual 2015-2020. Iran fisheries organization, deputy of planning and development manager, office of Budget and planning. 64p.
9.Afham, F., & Falsafian, A. (2017). dentification of Price and Non-Price Factors Affecting Willingness to Consume Fish Among Households of Urmia City: Application of Ordered Logit Model. Agricultural Economics. 11 (3), 55-79.
10.Hu, Y., Yuan, C., Yu, K., Qu, Y., Chen, S., Wang, X., & Kimura, I. (2014). An online survey study of consumer preferences on aquatic products in China: current seafood consumption patterns and trends. Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal, 5 (2), 1-6.
11.Azam, M., Rahman, M. B., Ruma, M., Azad, S. O., Alom, M. S., Ali, M. Y., & Islam, S. M. (2016). Marketing system of some fish species in the North-Eastern region of Bangladesh: An empirical study. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 4, 923-927.
12.Hosseini, S. M., Dabbagh Moghaddam, A., & Adeli, A. (2020). An evaluating of Barriers to Fish Consumption and Purchase acrossS Different Consumer Groups (Case Study: army Personnel). Journal of utilization and cultivatinn of aquatics. 9 (3), 51-77.
13.Adeli, A. (2014). A study of some situational factors on home consuming behavior fishes in Tehran. Journal of Fisheries. 67 (2), 251-261.
14.Nikoukar, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Nematollahi, Z. (2017). Analytical Comparison of Factors Affecting Fish Consumption in the Cities of Sari and Mashhad. Journal of agricultural economic and development. 31 (4), 299-310.
15.Farshidi, H., Madani, A., Ezati Rad, R., Montaseri, M., Rostami Qeshmi, I., & Iqbal Eftekhari, T. (2020). Pattern of fish consumption in the food table of households in Hormozgan province. J. Prevent Med. 7 (1), 31-24.
16.Alinejad, S., Yektaye Gorabi, K., & Aminifard, A. (2015). Investigation on Consumption of Seafood of Rasht City Population & Finding the Effective Factors on its Demand. Iranian scientific fisheries journal. 4 (3), 1-18.
17.Pangh, E., Adeli, A., & Taghani, T. (2022). Investigating the trend of fish consumer’s behavior in the villages of coastal regions of Golestan province. Journal of fisheries. 75 (1), 153-167.
18.Jafarpour, S. A. (2015). Effects of Different Cooking Methods on Physical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Rainbow Trout Fillets (Oncorhychus mykiss). JFST. 4 (1), 19-31.
19.Aydin, A., & Bashimov, G. (2020). Determination of fish consumption habits of consumers: case study of Mary city, Turkmenistan. Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, 9 (2), 118-124. ‏
20.Erdogan, B. E., Mol, S., & Coşansu, S. (2011). Factors Influencing the Consumption of Seafood in Istanbul, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 11, 631-639.
21.Ribeiro, A. R., Altintzoglou, T., Mendes, J., Nunes, M. L., Dinis, M. T., & Dias, J. (2019). Farmed fish as a functional food: perception of fish fortification and the influence of origin–insights from Portugal. Aquaculture, 501, 22-31.
22.Rezaei Pandari, H., Keshavarz Mohammadi, N., Ramezankhani, A., Morowatisharifabad, M., & Rahaei, Z. (2014). Consumers Analysis Towards Fish Consumption, and its Related Factors, Barriers of Consumption and Promotion Strategies using Social Marketing frame work among women in Yazd city in 2013. TB. 13 (3), 98-11.
23.Fotea, L., Leonte, D., Costăchescu, E., Hoha, G., Leonte, C., & Nistor, C. E. (2011). Research on the level of awareness and consumption of fish among youngsters. Lucrări Științifice-Universitatea de Științe Agricole șiMedicină Veterinară, Seria Zootehnie, 55, 273-275.
24.Adeli, A., & Mirbagheri, V. S. (2019). Estimation of awareness of fisheries students with regarding to benefits of fish consumption. Iranian Scientific Fisheries Journal. 27 (6), 79-91.
25.Mosavi Dehmordi, L., Famil Mohamadi, A., & Behdani, Z. (2013). An analysis of the fish consumption in Isfahan. Journal of fisheries. 4 (65), 439-446.
26.Reyhani Poul, S. (2021). Analysis of conceptual model of fish buyer’s behavior (Case study: west of Mazandaran Province). Iranian scientific fisheries journal. 30 (3), 149-163.
27.Adeli, A., Hasangholipour, T., Hossaini, A., Salehi, H., & Shabanpour, B. (2010). Identifying the main factors affecting home consumption attitude to farmed fishes among Tehrani households. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences. 19 (3), 87-96.
28.Okey, I. B. (2019). Consumer Preferences for Wild and Farmed Fish in Different Urban Communities of Central Cross River, Nigeria. Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Research, 4(1), 016-023.
29.Lawley, M., Birch, D., & Hamblin, D. (2012). An exploratory study into the role and interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic cues in Australian consumers’ evaluations of fish. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 20 (4), 260-267.
30.Khan, A. Q., Aldosari, F., & Hussain, S. M. (2018). Fish consumption behavior and fish farming attitude in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17 (2), 195-199.
31.Adeli, A., Ghafari, T., Ojagh, S., & Vahedi, M. (2019). An evaluating of factors affecting on purchase and sale trends in fish markets in ports of Guilan Province. Isfj. 28 (3), 55-65.
32.Adeli, A., Alidoosti, K., Kordjazi, M., Vahedi, M., & Erabi, H. (2020). Evaluating the Mixed Marketing Factors of Tehran Big Fish Market from the Sellers' Viewpoint. JAD. 14 (3), 55-69.
33.McManus, A., Hunt, W., Storey, J., McManus, J., & Hilhorst, S. (2014). Perceptions and preference for fresh seafood in an Australian context. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 38, 146-152.
34.Moslemi, M., Rahimi, M., Abedi, R., & Hosseini, S. V. (2019). Investigating on the marketing of fishery products by prioritizing factors affecting fish consumers: A case study in Babolsar. Journal of aquaculture science. 7 (1), 89-95.
35.Kitano, S., & Yamamoto, N. (2020). The role of consumer knowledge, experience, and heterogeneity in fish consumption: Policy lessons from Japan. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102151. ‏
36.Motalebi, M., Sharifirad, Gh. R., Mostafavi, F., Mohebi, S., & Azadbakht, L. (2012). Investigating factors affecting fish consumption based on the structures of health education models. Journal of health system research. 8 (4), 523-536.
37.Golkar, S., Nabieyan, S., Amirteymoori, S., & Khajepour, E. (2021). Factors affecting the choice of high-consumption marine fish (Case study: Bandar Abbas county). Iranian scientific fisheries journal. 30 (3), 111-120.
38.Dourandish, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., & Nematollahi, Z. (2016). 'Assessment the effective component of seafood consumption in Mashhad (Comparison of Double-Hurdle model and Heckman two-stage method)', Agricultural Economics, 9 (4), 197-219.
39.Ahmadi, Z., Chitsaz, H., & Akrami, R. (2015). Compare the amount of fish consumption in rural and urban communities rely on both public and private jobs in Golestan Province. New technologies in aquaculture development (journal of fisheries).10 (3), 15-26.
40.Ziaee, S., Samare Hashemi, Kh., & Samare Hashemi, S. A. (2017). Investigation of factors affecting fresh fish consumption in Iran. Iranian Journal of Fisheries. 26 (3), 119-127.
41.Mitra, S., Khatun, M. N., Prodhan, M. M. H., & Khan, M. A. (2021). Consumer preference, willingness to pay, and market price of capture and culture fish: Do their attributes matter? Aquaculture, 544, 737139. ‏
42.Dadgar, Sh., Salehi, H., Hajimirrahimi, S. D., & Teimoori, M. (2015). Measuring of per capita fish consumption and assessing barriers and development strategies for consumption in Markazi Province. Iranian scientific fisheries journal. 23 (4), 17-19.
43.Cardoso, C., Lourenco, H., Costa, S., Goncalves, S., & Leonor Nunes, M. (2013). Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the portuguese population. Gender and regional variability. 64, 20-31.
44.Devadawson, C., Jayasinghe, C., & Sivakanesan, R. (2015). Fish availability and consumer preference in batticaloa district in sri lanka. Journal of Experimental Biology, 3, 1.
45.Can, M. F., Günlü, A., & Can, H. Y. (2015). Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it. Food Science and Technology, 35 (2), 339-346.
46.Alidoosti, K., Adeli, A., Kordjazi, M., & Vahedi, M. (2020). Purchase behavior of fish consumers of Besat fish market in Tehran. JFST. 9 (2), 66-78.
‏47.Menozzi, D., Nguyen, T. T., Sogari, G., Taskov, D., Lucas, S., Castro-Rial, J. L. S., & Mora, C. (2020). Consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for fish products with health and environmental labels: Evidence from five European countries. Nutrients, 12 (9), 2650. ‏
48.Tomić, M., Lucević, Z., Tomljanović, T., & Matulić, D. (2017). Wild-caught versus farmed fish–consumer perception. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 75(2), 41-50.
49.Yeşilsu, A. F., Özyurt, G., Dağtekin, M., & Alp-Erbay, E. (2019). Wild Fish vs. Farmed Fish: Consumer Perception in Turkey. Aquaculture Studies, 19(1), 37-43.
50.López-Mas, L., Claret, A., Reinders, M. J., Banovic, M., Krystallis, A., & Guerrero, L. (2021). Farmed or wild fish? Segmenting European consumers based on their beliefs. Aquaculture, 532, 735992.
مجله بهره برداری و پرورش آبزیان
دوره 12، شماره 4
دی 1402
صفحه 123-141

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار