بررسی کیفیت پساب مزارع میگوی وانامی، Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone 1931) وارد شده به تالاب بین‌المللی گمیشان

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 نویسنده مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری بوم‌شناسی آبزیان، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 استاد دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

3 استاد مرکز تحقیقات آبزی‌پروری و آرتمیا، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

4 استاد دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران.

5 دانشیار انستیتو تحقیقات آب‌های ساحلی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی، اوریگروند، اپسالا، سوئد.

6 محقق دانشکده علوم، مهندسی و محیط، دانشگاه دیکین، جیلونگ، ویکتوریا، استرالیا

7 دانش‌آموخته دکتری شیلات، دانشکده شیلات و محیط زیست، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده
یکی از مهم‌ترین مشکلات مرتبط با توسعه صنعت آبزی پروری به خصوص در مجتمع‌های بزرگ آبزی پروری، آلودگی پساب خروجی آن‌ها است. هدف از این تحقیق، بررسی کیفیت پساب مزارع مجتمع پرورش میگوی وانامی (830 هکتار) وارد شده به تالاب گمیشان بود. جهت انجام طرح از 12 ایستگاه در طول مسیر ورودی دریا به استخرهای پرورش میگوی وانامی، در استخر پرورش میگو، لاگون مصنوعی، خروجی لاین‌های مزارع و داخل تالاب گمیشان در دو مقطع زمانی اواسط اردیبهشت (در زمان خروجی 30 درصد از پساب مزارع میگو) و اوایل آبان 1396 (انتهای فصل پرورش و تخلیه کامل آب مزارع) نمونه برداری صورت گرفت. برخی پارامترهای کیفی آب شامل pH، فسفات کل، هدایت الکتریکی، نیاز بیوشیمیایی اکسیژن، دما، اکسیژن محلول، کدورت، کلیفرم و نیترات اندازه‌گیری گردید. نتایج نشان داد که بر اساس شاخص WQI، کیفیت آب در طول مسیر از خروجی مزارع به طرف تالاب از کیفیت بد(71/48) تا خوب(96/78) متغیر است. بنظر می‌رسد لاگون‌ تعبیه شده از نظر طول، عرض، عمق و شیب مسیر کانال منتهی به تالاب، در افزایش کیفیت آب ورودی به تالاب گمیشان از حالت کیفی بد به خوب اثرگذار است.
واژه های کلیدی: پساب، مجتمع پرورش میگوی وانامی، تالاب گمیشان، شاخص WQI

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the effluent quality of Vannamei shrimp farms, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone 1931) Entered Gamishan International Wetland

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Ghodrati 1
  • Rasoul Ghorbani 2
  • Naser Agh 3
  • Seyed Aliakbar Hedayati 4
  • Rahmatollah Naddafi 5
  • Ali Jalali 6
  • Fakhriye Shiroodmirzai 7
1 Corresponding Author, Ph.D. Student of Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
3 Professor, Artemia and Aquaculture Research Institute, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
4 Professor, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
5 Associate Prof., Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Coastal Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 74242 Öregrund, Uppsala County, Sweden
6 Research Fellow, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
7 Ph.D. Graduate of Fisheries, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
effluent and pollution is one of the most important problems related to the development of the aquaculture industry, especially in large aquaculture complexes. The purpose of this research was to investigate the quality of wastewater from Vanamei shrimp farming complex (830 ha) entering Gamishan wetland. sampling carried out from 12 stations along the sea entrance route to Vanamei shrimp breeding ponds, artificial lagoon, exit of farm lines, channel leading to the lagoon and inside the Gomishan lagoon at two time points in mid-May (at the time of the outlet of 30% of the wastewater from the shrimp farms) and November 2017 (end of breeding season and complete testing of water in farms). some of the water quality parameters measured including pH, total phosphate, electrical conductivity, biochemical requirement, temperature, nitrate, solution, turbidity, coliform and nitrate. The results showed that according to the WQI index, the water quality categorizes from bad(48.71) to good(78.96) quality. It seems that the artificial lagoon and the characteristics of the length, width, depth and slope of the channel leading to the wetland are effective in increasing the quality of the water entering Gamishan Wetland from bad to good quality.
Keywords: Effluent, Vanamei shrimp breeding complex, Gamishan wetland, WQI index.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Effluent
  • Vanami shrimp breeding complex
  • Gamishan wetland
  • WQI index

مراجع

1.Boone, L. (1931). A collection of anomuran and macruran Crustacea from the Bay of Panama and the fresh waters of the Canal Zone. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 63, 137-189.
2.Preston, N. R. (2002). The environmental management of shrimp farming in Australia, Report prepared under the word Bank, NACE and FAO, 9.
3.Naylor, R., Goldberg, R., Mooney, H., Beveridge, M., Clay, J., Folke, C., Kautsky, N., Hubchenco, J., Primavera, J., & Williams, M. (1998). Natures subsides to shrimp and salmon farming. Science. 283, 883-884.
4.Valiollahi, J., & Shirazi, G. (2017). Management of reproduction and breeding of aquatic animals, enviromental effects of fisheries development, Shahid Rajaei University of Tehran, Salehin Publications, 289p.
5.Khodashenas, A., Hedayati, A. A., Ghorbani, R., Hosseini, A., & Saghali, M. (2017). Efficiency of sewage treatment lagoon on pollution load reduction of Gomishan shrimp farm effluent in Golestan province. isfj. 26 (2), 163-167.
6.Omrani, S., Kheyrabadi, V., & Ali Akbarian Ghanati, A. (2019). Study of diversity, density and phytoplankton concentration in summer stress of environmental parameters (case study: Gomishan international wetland). Isfj. 28 (4), 209-215.
7.Riazi, B. (2001). Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetland (RIS). Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
8.Saghali, M., Yahyavi, M., & Yelghi, S. (2013). Review the composition and abundance of west white shrimp farms macrobenthoses (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Gomishan,Golestan Province. New technologies in aquaculture development. Journal of Fisheries. 7, 29-36.
9.Salehan, A. H., Ghorbani, R., Hosseini, S. A., Yelghi, S., Salehi, H., & Amooei Khoozani, E. (2015). A Survey on Growth Performance of Litopenaeus Vannamei in Gomishan Ponds, Golestan. Journal of Aquaculture Development. 3, 39-50.
10.Thiago Awad Prudente, Maria A. N., de Meirelles, Jose A. S. A dos Anjos, & Roberto G. dos Santos. (2017). Degradation of mangrove ecosystems due to shrimp farming activities and its conflicts of interest in the state of Bahia, Brazil. Modern Environmental Science and Engineering. 4, 224-230.
11.Rosa Amalia, Sri Rejeki, Lestari Lakshmi Widowati, & Restiana Wisnu Aryati. (2022). The growth of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and its dynamics of water quality in integrated culture. Biodiversitas. 1, 593-600.
12.Ferreira, N. C., Bonetti, C., & Seiffert, W. Q. (2011). Hydrological and water quality indices as management tools in marine shrimp culture. Aquaculture. 318 (3), 425-433.
13.Khodami, S. (2004). The assessment quality effluent from shrimp aquaculture site in Gwatar (In Baluchestan Province). Iranian Fisheries Research Institute. 145p. [In Farsi]
14.Ozesmi, S. L., & Bauer, E. M. (2002). Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 10, 381-402.
15.Smith, P. T. (1996). Characterisation of effluent from prawn ponds on the Clarence River. Pacon Conference, Australia. 11p.
16.Burkholder, J., et al. (2006). Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality. Environmental health perspectives, 115 (2), 308-312.
17.Kiabi, B., Ghaemi, R. A., & Abdoli, A. (2001). Wetland and riverain ecosystems of Golestan Province. Department of the environment golestan provincial. 182p.
18.Black, D. (2001). Environmental impact of aquaculture, science direct, Aquaculture, 3, 3-9.
19.Behrouzi-Rad, B., Hasanzadeh Kiabi, B., & Ghaemi, R. (2012). Investigation of density, Diversity and population trend of wintering waerbirds in Gomishan international wetland in Golestan Province (2007-2012). Wetland Ecobiology. 13 (4), 63-73. [In Persian]
20.Lenore, S., Clescerl, Arnold, E. G., & Andrew, D. Eaton. (1999). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater.
21.Miraslow, R., & Vcadimir, N. (1990). Practical enviromental analysis. Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (www.rec.org). 466p.
22.Krebs, C. J. (1944). Ecology The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 4th ed, Harper Collins, New York.
23.Tavakoli, F., Mohammadi-Rouzbahani, M., & Sobhan-Ardekani, S. (2018). Survey of the River Water Quality Using Water Quality Indices (Case Study Aligoodarz River). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Article in press.
24.Karamouz, M., Mahjouri, N., & Kerachian, R. (2004). ”River Water Quality Zoning: A case study of Karoon and Dez river system”, Iranian J. Env. Health Sci. Eng. 1 (2), 16-27.
25.Humphery, C., & Dostine, P. L. (1994). Development of biological monitoring programs to detect mining-waste impacts upon aquatic ecosystems of the Alligator Rivers Region, Northern Territry, Australia, Mitt. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24, 293-314.
26.Saksena, D. N., Garg, R. K., & Rao, R. J. (2008). Water quality and pollution status of Chambal River in National Chambal Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Environmental Biology. 29 (5), 701-10.
27.Kheyrabadi, V. (2014). Seasonal changes in phytoplankton community structure in relation to physico-chemical water factors of Gomishan international wetland in Golestan Province. Master thesis, university of Zabol. 96p.
28.Shiroodmirzaie, F., Ghorbani, R., Hoseyni, S. A., Parafkande Haghighi, F., & Nasrollahzade Saravi, H. (2018). Enviromental impact assessment of aquaculture effluent on benthic fauna;case study: Gomishan wetland, Golestan Province. Journal of animal environment. 4.
29.Basatnia, N. (2011). Effect of aquaculture effluent on macroinvertebrates diversity and abundance of Gomishan Lagoon. Master Science and Natural Resources, 7p.
30.Robert, H. (2001). Best management practices for Hawaiian aquaculture Center for tropical and subtropical aquaculture. Waimanalo, Hawaii, USA: Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture Publication.
31.Aazami, J., et al. (2018). Ecological quality assessment of Kor River in Fars Province using macroinvertebrates indices. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, pp. 1-10.
32.Abbaspour, R., et al. (2014). Water quality assessment of cheshmekileh river with using community of macrobenthic invertebrates and physicochemical factors of water. Iranian Journal of Environment, 2 (1), 23-29.
33.Chien, Y. H. (1992). Water quality requirement an management for marine shrimp culture. Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Oceanic University Keelung, Taiwan, pp. 30-42.
34.Mirzajani, A. R., Khodaparast, H., Babaei, H., Abedini, A., & Dadi Ghandi, A. (2010). Eutriphication Trend of Anzali Wetland Based on 1992-2002 data. Journal of environmental studies. 52, 19-21.
35.Alabama department of Environmental management water quality branch water division. 2008. Total maximum daily load for Flint river assessment unit pathogens (Fecal coliform). 33p.
36.Phillips, M. J. (1990). Water quality management for aquaculture and fisheries. Bangladesh aquaculture and fisheries resource unit. Ins, of aqu. University of Stirlling. 21p.
مجله بهره برداری و پرورش آبزیان
دوره 13، شماره 4
دی 1403
صفحه 1-12

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار