مدلAHP فازی برای ارزیابی بهترین روش استفاده از پسماندکارخانه کنسرو ماهی (مطالعه موردی کارخانه کنسرو ماهی بابلسر)

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فارغ التحصیل شیلات

2 مدیرکل محیط زیست استان تهران

چکیده

پسماند تولید شده در صنعت کنسروسازی ماهی به دلیل محتوای بالای پروتئین آن دارای اهمیت بسیاری می‌باشد. در کشور ایران این پسماند تنها از روش دیگ پخت مورد استفاده مجدد قرار می‌گیرد. استفاده مجدد از پسماند صنایع غذایی می‌تواند راهکار موثری جهت کاهش ضایعات، تثبیت زباله های مواد غذایی و همچنین تولید انرژی و در نهایت آسیب کمتر به محیط زیست باشد. در این تحقیق با استفاده از روش سلسله مراتبی AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) و شناسایی برخی از روش‌های استفاده از پسماند ماهی، از بین گزینه‌های دیگ پخت، کمپوست هوازی، هیدرولیز آنزیمی و زباله سوز با استفاده از معیارهای فنی، اقتصادی، محیط زیستی و مدیریتی به تشخیص بهترین روش استفاده از پسماند کارخانه کنسرو ماهی پرداخته شد. نتایج حاصل از AHP نشان داد که از نظر متخصصین با توجه به معیارها و زیر معیارهای زیست محیطی، اقتصادی، فنی و مدیریتی، بهترین روش دیگ پخت با امتیاز0/459 در اولویت استفاده از پسماند کنسرو ماهی قرار می‌گیرد. پس از آن روش‌های هیدرولیز آنزیمی، کمپوست هوازی و زباله سوز به ترتیب با امتیاز 0/256و0/189 و 0/097 قرار گرفتند. نرخ ناسازگاری کلی نیز برابر با 0.07 بود که این امر نشان دهنده قابل اعتماد بودن نتایج ارزیابی و اعتبار مدل می‌باشد.با توجه شرایط مورد بررسی و آنالیز حساسیت، دیگ پخت به عنوان بهترین روش برای مدیریت و ساماندهی پسماند کارخانه کنسرو ماهی در شهرک صنعتی میرود شناخته شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A fuzzy AHP model to assess the best method for using Fish Canning Plant (Case study the Mirod fish Fish Canning Plant)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marziyeh Aghasi 1
  • Naser Mehrdadi 2
1
2 Tehran Environmental Directorate General
چکیده [English]

The waste produced in the canning industry is very importance because of its high protein content. In Iran, these wastes are reused only by the boiler (fish meal and fish oil) method. Reuse of food waste can be an effective way to reduce waste, stabilizing food waste as well as generating energy, using modern processing methods and less damage to the environment.In this research, using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and identifying some methods for using fish waste, among the alternatives of fish meal, aerated compost, enzymatic hydrolysis and waste incineration using technical, economical, environmental and administration has identified the best way to utilizing waste from the factory for fish canning plant.The results of AHP showed that according to the experts, criteria and sub-criteria of environmental, economical, technical and administration, the best method for using fish waste canning was fish meal with a score of 0/459. The enzymes hydrolysis, aerobic compost and waste incinerators were rated at 0/256, 0/189 and 0/097 respectively. Ultimately, sensitivity analysis was carried out toward the general purpose. The overall inconsistency rate was also 0.07, which indicates the reliability of the evaluation results and the validity of the model.Regarding the studied conditions and sensitivity analysis, fishmeal was recognized as the best method for managing and using fish waste canning planet in the industrial city of Mirood.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • AHP
  • fish waste canning
  • waste manegment

مراجع

1.Arvanitoyannis, I.S., and Kassaveti, A. 2008. Fish industry waste: treatments, environmental impacts, current and potential uses. Inter. J. Food Sci. Technol. 43: 4. 726-745.
2.Baere, L.d.m., and Mattheeuws, B. 2010. Anaerobic digestion of MSW in Europe. BioCycle. 51: 2. 24-26.
3.Chaulya, S. 2003. Water resource development study for a mining region. Water resources management. 17: 4. 297-316.
4.Diniz, F.M., and Martin, A.M. 1997. Optimization of nitrogen recovery in the enzymatic hydrolysis of dogfish (Squalus acanthias) protein. Composition of the hydrolysates. Inter. J. Food Sci. Nutr.48: 3. 191-200.
5.Eiroa, M., Costa, J., Alves, M., Kennes, C., and Veiga, M.C. 2012. Evaluation of the biomethane potential of solid fish waste. Waste management. 32: 7. 1347-1352.
6.Gildberg, A. 2002. Enhancing returns from greater utilization. Safety and quality issues in fish processing, Elsevier: Pp: 425-449.
7.Huang, I.B., Keisler, J., and Linkov, I. 2011. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Science of the total environment. 409: 19. 3578-3594.
8.Jozi, S.A., and Firouzei, M. 2014. Analysis for Environmental Impactsof Chicken Slaughterhouses Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method (Case study: Nemone TehranPoultry Slaughterhouse). Iran. J. Health Environ. 6: 4. 455-470.
9.Kannan, S., Gariepy, Y., and Raghavan, G.V. 2018. Optimization of the conventional hydrothermal carbonization to produce hydrochar from fish waste. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.Pp: 1-14.
10.Kaya, T., and Kahraman, C. 2010. Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy. 35: 6. 2517-2527.
11.Karimi, A., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, J., Nabi Bidhendi, G., and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. 2010. Investigation of wastewater treatment plants of Iran,s industrial estates and proposed a suitable model for optimum wastewater treatment process selection, Thesis for degree of Ph.D in Environmental Engineering. Tehran University, Faculty of Environment. 2010: 56-61.
12.Khoshand, A., Kamalan, H., and Rezaei, H. 2018. Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to assess options of energy recovery from municipal solid waste: a case study in Tehran, Iran. J. Mater. Cycle Waste Manage. Pp: 1-12.
13.Koseoglu, B., Buber, M., and Toz, A.C. 2018. Optimum site selection for oil spill response center in the Marmara
Sea using the AHP-TOPSIS method. Archives of Environmental Protection.
14.Leme, M.M.V., Rocha, M.H., Lora, E.E.S., Venturini, O.J., Lopes, B.M., and Ferreira, C.H. 2014. Techno-economic analysis and environmental impact assessment of energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in Brazil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87: 8-20.
15.Lopes, C., Antelo, L.T., Franco-Uría, A., Alonso, A.A., and Pérez-Martín, R. 2015. Valorisation of fish by-products against waste management treatments -Comparison of environmental impacts. Waste management. 46: 103-112.
 16.Lin, C.H., Wen, L., and Tsai, Y.M. 2010. Applying decision-making tools to national e-waste recycling policy: an example of analytic hierarchy process. Waste management, 30: 5. 863-869.
17.Mianabadi, H., and Afshar, A. 2008. Multi attribute decision making to rank urban water supply schemes. Water Wastewater J. 19: 66. 34-45.
18.Mazzarino, M.J., Laos, F., Satti, P.,and Moyano, S. 1998. Agronomic and environmental aspects of utilization of organic residues in soils of the Andean-Patagonian region. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 44: 1. 105-113.
19.Mshandete, A., Kivaisi, A., Rubindamayugi, M., and Mattiasson, B. 2004. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresource technology, 95: 1. 19-24.
20.Mikkelsen, P., Häfliger, M., Ochs, M., Jacobsen, P., Tjell, J., and Boller. M. 1997. Pollution of soil and groundwater from infiltration of highly contaminated stormwater-a case study. Water Science and Technology, 36: 8-9. 325-330.
21.Pun, K., Tsang, Y., Choy, K., Tang, V., and Lam, H. 2017. A Fuzzy-AHP-Based Decision Support System for Maintenance Strategy Selection in Facility Management. Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2017 Portland International Conference on, IEEE.
22.Quitain, A.T., Sato. N., Daimon, H., and Fujie, K. 2001. Production of valuable materials by hydrothermal treatment of shrimp shells. Industrial and engineering chemistry research, 40: 25. 5885-5888.
23.Radziemska, M., Vaverková, M.D., Adamcová, D., Brtnický, M., and Mazur, Z. 2018. Valorization of Fish Waste Compost as a Fertilizer for Agricultural Use. Waste and Biomass Valorization, Pp: 1-9.
24.Rustad, T. 2003. Utilisation of marine by-products. Elec. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2: 4. 458-463.
25.Razavi-Shirazi, H. 2002. Seafood technology: principles handling.
26.Sahu, B., Das, K., Barik, N., Paikaray, A., Agnibesh, A., Mohapatra, S., Mahanta, K., Nayak, S., and Jayasankar, P. 2017. Development of Fish Hydrolysate (Bind-Add+) incorporated extruded pellets and its performance in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) feeding trial. Inter. J. Adv. Engin. Res. Sci. 4: 1.
27.Shokihian, M., and Omrani, N. 2017. Techno-economical and environmental evaluation of waste to energy metod rankeing by the options using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
28.Sheets, J.P., Yang, L., Ge, X., Wang,Z., and Li, Y. 2015. Beyond land application: Emerging technologies for the treatment and reuse of anaerobically digested agricultural and food waste. Waste Management. 44: 94-115. civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development of Contemporary IRAN. Tehran, Iran.
29.Tecle, A., Fogel, M., and Duckstein,L. 1988. Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives.J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage.114: 4. 383-398.
30.Wang, G., Qin, L., Li, G., and Chen, L. 2009. Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: a case study in Beijing, China.J. Environ. Manage. 90: 8. 2414-2421.
31.Wind, Y., and Saaty, T.L. 1980. Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 26: 7. 641-658.
32.Yesilnacar, M.I., and Cetin, H. 2005. Site selection for hazardous wastes: A case study from the GAP area, Turkey. Engineering Geology, 81: 4. 371-388.
33.Zeng, G., Jiang, R., Huang, G., Xu,M., and Li, J. 2007. Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 82: 2. 250-259.
مجله بهره برداری و پرورش آبزیان
دوره 8، شماره 4
اسفند 1398
صفحه 93-103

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار