1. Almaca, C. 1984. Form Relationships Among Western Palearctic Species of Barbus
(Cyprinidae, pisces). Arquiros do Museu Bocage 2(12): 207-248.
2. Berg, L.S. 1932. Eine neue Barilius-Art (Pisces, Cyprinidae) aus Mesopotamien. Zool. Anz.
100(11/12): 332-334.
3. Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometri and Biology.
Cambridge: Cambrige University Press. 435p.
4. Bookstein, F.L. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics in Marcus, L.F.,
Corti, M., loy, A., Naylor, G., Slice, D.E., eds, Advances in morphometrics. Nato Asi series
A: Life Sciences 284: 131-151.
5. Bookstein, F.L. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks localizing group
differences in outline shape. In: Rohlf, F.J & Bookstein, F.L. (eds), Workshop on
Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. Vol. Institute of Gerontology,
University of Michigan, USA. 225-243.
6. Coad, B.W. 2017. Freshwater Fishes of Iran. http://www.briancoad.com (10 April 2017).
7. Ghorbani-Ranjbari, Z., and Keivany, Y. 2017a. Geometric morphometric comparison of
Barilius mesopotamicus (Berg 1932) populations in Bushehr basin. J. Anim. Res.:
Submitted.
8. Ghorbani-Ranjbari, Z., and Keivany, Y. 2017b. Geometric morphometric comparison of
Barilius mesopotamicus (Berg 1932) populations in Jarrahi River basin. J. Aquat. Ecol.:
Submitted.
9. Ghorbani-Ranjbari, Z., and Keivany, Y. 2017c. Geometric morphometric comparison of
Barilius mesopotamicus (Berg 1932) populations in Diala River basin. J. Fish.: Submitted.
10.Jamali-Ashtiani, A., Eagderi, S., Khorasani, N., and Zamani-Faradonbe, M. 2016.
Comparison of body shape features of Kura barbel (Barbus lacerta, Heckel 1834) in
Caspian, Tigris and Uremia Lake basins using geometric morphometrics technique. J. Anim.
Env. 7(4): 143-150.
11.Jalili, P., Eagderi, S., and Keivany, Y. 2015. Body shape comparison of Kura bleak
(Alburnus filippii) in Aras and Ahar-Chai rivers using geometric morphometric approach.
Res. Zool. 5 (1): 20-24
12.Jouladeh-Roudbar, A., and Vatandoust, S. 2015. The evaluation of morphometric and
meristic characters of Barilus mesopotamicus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in Seimareh,
Changoleh and Siahgave Rivers in Ilam province. Journal of Exploitation and Aquaculture
1(4): 6-47.
13.Jouladeh-Roudbar, A., Eagderi, S., and Vatandoust, S. 2016. Comparison of morphological
and molecular characters of riverine and lake populations of Barilus mesopotamicus in Tigris
basin. J. Wetl. Ecobiol. 8(4): In press.
14.Keivany, Y., Nasri, M., Abbasi, K., and Abdoli, A. 2016. Atlas of Inland Water Fishes of
Iran. Iran Department of Environment Press, Tehran, Iran. 218p.
15.Keivany, Y., and Ghorbani-Ranjbari, Z. 2017a. Biometry of Barilius mesopotamicus (Berg
1932) populations in Iran. Nova Biologica Reperta: Submitted.
16.Keivany, Y., and Ghorbani-Ranjbari, Z. 2017b. Contribution to the biology of Barilius
mesopotamicus populations in Iran. J. Fish. Sci. Technol.: Submitted.
17.Keivany, Y., Tahmasebi, A., and Farhadian, F. 2017. Body shape variation of Kura barb
(Barbus spp.) in Iranian basins. Journal of Experimental Anim. Biol.: Submitted.
18.Kuliev, Z.M. 1984. On the variability of morphometric charactets in the Caspian roach,
Rutilus rutilus caspicus (Yakovlev) (Cyprinidne). Vopr. Ikhtiol. 24(6): 935-945.
19.Langerhans, R.B., and Reznick, D.N. 2010. Ecology and evolution of swimming
performance in fishes: predicting evolution with biomechanics. In: Domenici, P. and Kapoor,
B.G. (eds), Fish locomotion: an ecoethological perspective. Science Publishers Inc, Enfield.
Pp: 200-248.
20.Motamedi, M., Madjdzadeh, S.M., Teimori, A., and Esmaeili, H.R. 2011. Systematic and
biogeography of the Barbus lacerta complex (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from Iran-inferred by
molecular and morphological evidence. 12th Annual Meeting of the Society of Biological
Systematics (Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik, GfBS). 21-27 February,
BioSystematics Berlin. P. 231.
21.Nelson, J.S., Grande, T.C., and Wilson, M.V.H. 2016. Fishes of the World. John Wiley and
Sons, New York, USA. 707p.
22.Pakkasmaa, S., and Piironen, J. 2001. Morphological differentiation among local trout
(Salmo trutta) populations. Biol. J. Lin. Soc.72(2): 231-239.
23.Pinheiro, A., Teixeira, C.M., Rego, A.L., Marques, J.F., and Cabral, H.N. 2005. Genetic and
morphological variation of Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) along the Portugese coast. Fish. Res.
73: 67-78.
24.Poulet, N., Berrebi, P., Crivelli, A.J., Lek, S., and Argillier, C. 2004. Genetic and
morphometric variation in the pikeperch Sander lucioperca of a fragmented delta. Arch.
Hydrobiol. 159 (4): 531-554.
25.Rohlf, F.J., and Marcus, L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 8:
129-132.
26.Swain, D.P., and Foote, C.J. 1999. Stocks and chameleons: The use of phenotypic variation
in stock identification. Fish. Res. 43: 113-128.
27.Tudela, S. 1999. Morphological variability in a Mediterranean, genetically homogeneous
population of the European anchovy, Engraulis ancrasicolur. Fish. Res. 42: 229-243.
28.Zamani-Faradonbeh, M., Eagderi, S., and Nasri, M. 2014. Geometrics morphometric
comparison of populations of Waspi, Cabdio morar (Hamilton, 1822) in Mashkil and
Mokran Basins. Iran. Sci. Fish. J. 23(2): 57-68.
29.Zelditch, M. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: a Primer. Elsevier Academic
Press, New York, USA. 437p.
)